Scientists aspiring to become science journalists often find the process of interviewing their sources challenging. Years of being wary of the impact and implications of research causes scientists to develop deep-rooted demure mannerisms.Limitations faced by scientists aspiring to work as science journalists:
Reluctance to conduct interviews over the phone rather than email
Asking tough questions that sources may not want to answer
Ingrained sense of caution when it comes to the wider implications of research
Addressing debatable issues and asking contentious questions that the sources might not always be comfortable answering
The demure mannerisms may, therefore, come in the way of showing the true picture about why science is important to the public, which is the job of a journalist.
If you are familiar with these limitations...start by:
Ditching the cautionary emails and push yourself to take interviews directly over the phone
Asking questions about the research processes and the hurdles faced, rather than focusing only on the published results. That's where the story lies!!
And, don't worry you won't be undermining the efforts or the standard of the research; no research is devoid of limitations and hinderances.
Komentáře