top of page
Writer's picturePialy Ghanekar

Important tips for scientists aspiring to become science journalists


Scientists aspiring to become science journalists often find the process of interviewing their sources challenging. Years of being wary of the impact and implications of research causes scientists to develop deep-rooted demure mannerisms.

Limitations faced by scientists aspiring to work as science journalists:


  • Reluctance to conduct interviews over the phone rather than email

  • Asking tough questions that sources may not want to answer

  • Ingrained sense of caution when it comes to the wider implications of research

  • Addressing debatable issues and asking contentious questions that the sources might not always be comfortable answering

The demure mannerisms may, therefore, come in the way of showing the true picture about why science is important to the public, which is the job of a journalist.


If you are familiar with these limitations...start by:

  • Ditching the cautionary emails and push yourself to take interviews directly over the phone

  • Asking questions about the research processes and the hurdles faced, rather than focusing only on the published results. That's where the story lies!!

  • And, don't worry you won't be undermining the efforts or the standard of the research; no research is devoid of limitations and hinderances.

Recent Posts

See All

10 journal selection tools

Here's a list of tools that can help you in your search for the perfect journal for your scientific manuscript: Jane (Journal Author/Name...

Verbs Vs Nouns in science writing

Verbs are 'spunky', while nouns are 'clunky' Quoted from 'Writing in the sciences' (Coursera) by Kristin Sainani Implication in writing -...

Comments


bottom of page